Understanding Birthright Citizenship and the Path to Constitutional Reform

The Supreme Court is currently considering President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship. A decision is expected by late June or early July 2026.

Regardless of the outcome, this issue raises important questions about the meaning of the 14th Amendment and the long-term future of American citizenship.

Citizen Outreach Foundation provides factual, nonpartisan information to help Americans understand the current system, its implications, and the only permanent mechanism for change: a constitutional amendment.

What Is Birthright Citizenship?

The Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, states:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

For more than 150 years, this language has been interpreted to grant automatic U.S. citizenship to nearly everyone born on American soil, regardless of their parents’ immigration status (with narrow exceptions for children of foreign diplomats and invading armies).

Recent estimates indicate that approximately 9% of U.S. births - roughly 320,000 children per year - are to mothers who are either unauthorized immigrants or temporary legal visitors (such as those on student, work, or tourist visas).

At-a-glance overview

  • Birthright citizenship is rooted in the 14th Amendment (1868).

  • Historically interpreted to cover nearly all births on U.S. soil.

  • Key phrase under debate: “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

  • Modern controversy involves children of non‑citizen parents.

The Current Debate and Supreme Court Case

In January 2025, President Trump issued an executive order directing federal agencies to interpret the 14th Amendment more narrowly, denying automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are neither citizens nor lawful permanent residents.

Lower courts have blocked the order. On April 1, 2026, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case. Observers noted significant skepticism from several justices toward the administration’s position, though the final ruling remains pending.

Key point: Even if the Supreme Court ultimately upholds the executive order, it would represent only a temporary policy change. Executive actions can be reversed by future administrations. The only way to enact a lasting, nationwide change that binds all branches of government and future presidents is through a constitutional amendment.

  • Executive orders: issued by the President, can be reversed or modified by future administrations.

  • Legislation: passed by Congress and signed by the President, but can be amended or repealed.

  • Constitutional amendments: require broad national agreement and are extremely difficult to change once ratified.

The Facts and Implications

Birthright citizenship has significant policy and fiscal dimensions:

  • Fiscal Impact: U.S.-born children of undocumented or temporary immigrants gain full access to public education, emergency healthcare, and other services funded by taxpayers. Long-term economic analyses estimate substantial lifetime contributions from many such individuals once they enter the workforce, but also note immediate and ongoing costs to states and localities for schooling and social services.

  • Scale: Projections suggest that, under current rules, roughly 750,000 children could be born between 2025 and 2044 to two undocumented or temporary immigrant parents.

  • Chain Migration: Automatic citizenship creates a pathway for parents and extended family to eventually petition for legal status.

  • Broader Context: The debate centers on whether the 14th Amendment’s “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” clause was intended to include children of non-citizens who owe primary allegiance to another country.

These are complex questions involving constitutional interpretation, demographics, economics, and national sovereignty. Reasonable Americans can disagree on the best policy.

The Process for

Constitutional Change

Amending the U.S. Constitution is intentionally difficult and requires broad national consensus. Under Article V, there are two paths:

Proposal by Congress (the method used for all 27 existing amendments): A proposed amendment must receive a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. No presidential approval is required.

Proposal by Constitutional Convention (never used): If two-thirds of state legislatures (34 states) apply to Congress, it must call a convention to propose amendments.

Ratification (required in either case): The proposed amendment must be approved by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50). Congress decides whether ratification occurs through state legislatures or state conventions. Once ratified, the amendment becomes part of the Constitution and can only be changed by another amendment.

Any change to birthright citizenship would likely take the form of a targeted amendment to the first sentence of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.

Article V in one glance

  1. Proposal:

    By either 2/3 of Congress or 2/3 of state legislatures (via convention)

THEN

  1. Ratification:

    3/4 of the states (38 of 50), by legislatures or state conventions.

THEN

  1. Constitutional Change:

    The amendment becomes part of the Constitution and can only be altered by another amendment.

Our Role at

Citizen Outreach Foundation

As a 501(c)(3) educational organization, the Citizen Outreach Foundation is dedicated to providing clear, factual information on citizenship policy, constitutional processes, and related fiscal and demographic data.

Stay Informed

Sign up for occasional educational updates from Citizenship Report. You’ll receive breaking news, and updates for these important issues.

* indicates required

Note: No political solicitations — only educational content.

Example Language Under Discussion

One straightforward proposal reads:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States to at least one parent who is a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Copy-friendly text: Select and copy the amendment language above as needed for research or discussion.

This would require at least one parent to hold U.S. citizenship or lawful permanent resident (green card) status while preserving traditional exceptions.

Our sister organization, Citizen Outreach (a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization), handles advocacy and grassroots mobilization, including petition efforts urging Congress to consider the Citizenship Amendment.

Additional Resources

Below are sample categories for downloadable PDFs and reference links. Final resources will include citations and links to primary-source documents.

Planned PDFs and summaries:

  • Historical background on the 14th Amendment
  • Demographic and economic data summaries
  • Full explanation of Article V
  • Comparative perspectives on citizenship laws in other countries

Primary-source links (online):

  • Full text of the U.S. Constitution
  • Relevant Supreme Court opinions and filings
  • Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports on birthright citizenship
  • Archived debates and historical commentaries on the 14th Amendment

The Citizen Outreach Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to nonpartisan education on issues of governance, citizenship, and fiscal responsibility.

Contributions are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law. We do not endorse or oppose candidates for public office.

© 2026 Citizen Outreach Foundation. All rights reserved.

Primary educational site: CitizenshipAmendment.org

Sister advocacy site: EndTheLoophole.org